Wako wapi waliodai Tume ya Katiba haina weledi na wala si huru!??
Ninasubiri kwa hamu kubwa kuwasikia waliosema kwa sauti kubwa nahadharani kabisa kuwa Tume ya Mabadiliko ya katiba nchini haina watu wenye weledi kwa kazi hiyo tena wakaenda mbali kuwa haiko huru tume hiyo kufanya kazi wanayotakiwa kufanya. Sasa baada ya rasimu hii natamani kuwasikia tena wakisema nakurudia maneno yale na pengine kwa kuyapigia mstari mkubwa!! "Peace is not simply about the absence of violence. It is defined by the presence of fundamental liberties and the prevalence of economic opportunities." AND If you're not ready to die for it, put the word 'freedom' out of your vocabulary.(Be wise with SPEED. A fool at forty, is a fool INDEED!
(3) Raia wa Jamhuri ya Muungano hatapelekwa katika nchi ya nje yoyote kujibu mashtaka au kufanyiwa mahojiano ya aina yoyote kinyume cha ridhaa yake.Download Rasimu ya Katiba Mpya hapa na toa maoni
Hii ina mana baada ya rasimu hii kupita tutaifanyia marekebisho sheria ya ugaidi au ... sheria hiyo itakuwa ya Tanganyika na Tanzania mpya itaunda sheria nyengine kukidhi matakwa ya katib
Soma na jipatie Rasimu ya Katiba aliyotangaza na Mzee Warioba hapa.
RASIMU YA KATIBA.pdf (395.2 KB, )
Hoja za Mwalimu Nyerere kupinga serikali tatu Tanzania
Nchi mbili zinapoungana na kuwa Nchi moja mifumo ya kawaida ya miundo ya Katiba ni miwili: Muungano wa Serikali Moja, au Shirikisho la serikali Tatu. Kwa mfumo wa kwanza kila nchi itafuta serikali yake na nchi mpya inayolizaliwa itakuwa ni nchi moja yenye Serikali moja. Katika mfumo wa pili kila nchi itajivua madaraka ambayo yatashikwa na serikali ya shirikisho na itakuwa na serikali ambayo itakuwa na mamlaka juu ya mambo yaliyobaki.
Mambo yatakayoshikwa na serikali ya Shirikisho ili yale ambayo yatashikwa na serikali ya shirikisho ni yale ambayo yakibaki katika nchi zilizoungana basi kwa kweli nchi hizo zitakuwa hazikuungana kuwa nchi moja bali zinaendelea kuwa nchi mbili zenye ushirikiano mkubwa katika mambo fulani fulani.
Nchi za Afrika Mashariki zilikuwa katika hali kama hiyo kabla ya kuvunjika kwa Jumuiya ya Afrika Mashariki. Zilikuwa ni Nchi Tatu zenye ushirikiano mkubwa, lakini hazikuwa Nchi Tatu zilizoungana kuwa Nchi Moja yenye muundo wa Shirikisho. Shirikisho halisi la nchi mbili litakuwa ni Nchi Moja yenye Serikali tatu, Serikali ya Shirikisho, na Serikali mbili za nchi mbili za awali zilizoungana kuzaa nchi mpya moja.
Tanganyika na Zanzibar zilipoamua kuungana na kuwa Nchi Moja, tungeweza kufuata mmojawapo wa mifumo hiyo ya kawaida. Lakini tulishindwa kufanya hivyo kwa sababu ya udogo wa Zanzibar na ukubwa wa Tanganyika. Zanzibar ilikuwa na watu laki tatu (300,000) na Tanganyika watu milioni kumi na mbili (12,000,000). Muungano wa Serikali Moja
Ungefanya ionekane kama Tanganyika imeimeza Zanzibar. Tulikuwa tunapigania Uhuru na Umoja wa Afrika; hatukutaka tuuhaniwe hata kwa makosa, kwanba tunaanzisha ubeberu mpya!
Kwa hiyo mimi nilipinga mfumo wa Serikali Moja. Shirikisho la Serikali Tatu lingekuwa ni gharama kubwa mno kwa Tanganyika. Zanzibar ingeendesha Serikali yake na kuchangia gharama za kuendesha Serikali ya Shirikisho; na Tanganyika ingefanya vivyo hivyo. Lakini ni dhahiri kwamba mchango wa Tanganyika ndio hasa ungeendesha SerikaIi ya Shirikisho. Kwa hiyo Tanganyika ingeendesha Serikali yake ya watu 12, 000, 000 na pia ndiyo ingetoa sehemu kubwa ya kuendesha Serikali ya Shirikisho la watu 12,300,000.
Ni Watu wanaofikiri kwa ndimi zao wanaodhani kuwa gharama ya Serikali yoyote kati ya hizo ingekuwa ndogo. Gharama ya Serikali ya Tanganyika isingekuwa ndogo, (waulizeni Wazanzibari), na wala ya Serikali ya Shirikisho isingekuwa ndogo. Hata bila ya gharama za mambo yasiyo ya Shirikisho. Na gharama zote hizo kwa kweli zingebebwa na Tanganyika.Kwa hivyo ilitupasa tujiulize kwa nini tunataka kuibebesha Tanganyika gharama zote hizo; na hasa kwa nini tunataka Serikali ya Tanganyika? Hivi tuna hofu ya kwamba Tanganyika, bila kuwa na SerikaIi yake, itaoekana kuwa imemezwa na Zanzibar? Hofu yetu ni kwamba tukiwa na Serikali Moja Tanganyika itaonekana kuwa imeimeza Zanzibar. Basi na tutafute mfumo ambao utaiondolea Zanzibar hofu hii ya kumezwa, bila kuibebesha Tanganyika mzigo wa kuendesha Serikalli mbili zenye uzito unaolingana.Hivyo ndivyo tulivyofanya, na hiyo ndiyo asili ya muundo wa Muungano wa serikali mbili. Badala ya kutungua mfumo uliopo kama wapumbavu, tulitazamia hali halisi yetu ilivyokuwa, na tukabuni mfumo uliotufaa zaidi.
Mwalimu Nyerere katika Uongozi wetu na Hatma ya Tanzania
Ninavyoona:Tukiunda serikali Tatu, ambapo Serikali ya Shirikisho itakuwa haina nguvu kuliko serikali za Tanganyika na Zanzibar, ni dhahiri haitachukua muda kabla shirikisho lenyewe halijafa, kwa sababu Watanganyika hawatakubali, kutokana na kwamba wao ndo watabeba mzigo zaidi!.
Kwa hiyo, Laiti Wazanzibar wangeona Mantiki ya Serikali mbili, na kujikita katika kutatua matatizo ya hapa na pale, bila shaka huu ungekuwa Muundo uliobora zaidi(reasonable Union).
Hata hivyo muundo ambao ungekuwa bora zaidi ulikuwa ni wa serikali moja, ila kutokana na hofu kama Alivyoonyesha Mwalimu, za "isije ikaonekana Tanganyika kuimeza Zanzibar", basi ni dhahiri muundo wa serikali mbili ndo unafaa kwa sasa na kwa miaka kadhaa ijayo.
Serikali Tatu hazitazaa nchi moja, Tusiongopeane!. zitazaa Loose Federation ambayo itakuwa haina Tija!, kama Mzanzibari anataka kuji"identify" kama Mzanzibari na Mtanganyika anataka kuji"identify" kama Mtanganyika, sasa hiyo Federation ni ya nini?. The world suffers a lot. Not because of the violence of bad people, but because of the silence of good people!.
Dkt Kawambwa: Serikali isilaumiwe matokeo mabaya Kidato cha Nne, adai hang'oki ng'oo!
*Asema hawezi kujiuzulu kwa mashinikizo ya kisiasa
*Adai matatizo ya elimu hayamalizwi kwa kujiuzuluWaziri wa Elimu Dkt Shukuru Kawambwa amesema serikali isilaumiwe kutokana na matokeo mabaya ya Kidato cha Nne mwaka 2012. Dkt Kawambwa pia amesema madai ya kumtaka ajiuzulu ni kelele za kupuuzwa kwani zinatolewa na wanasiasa waliokosa fursa za kuchaguliwa na kuwa madarakani hivyo wameamua kufanya propaganda. Amewataka wananchi kupuuza propaganda hizo kwani kama ni matokeo mabaya si kwa shule za serikali pekee nbali hata za watu binafsi zikiwemo Seminari pia zimefanya vibaya...
Source Star TV
Naona Waziri ameamua kuleta visingizio. Huyu ndiye tunatarajia atutoe hapa tulipo na atauongoze kutafuta suluhu ya janga hili lakini yeye haoni kama Taasisi anayoiongoza yaani Wizara ya Elimu ina mchango mkubwa katika hili....Tutafika?
*Adai matatizo ya elimu hayamalizwi kwa kujiuzuluWaziri wa Elimu Dkt Shukuru Kawambwa amesema serikali isilaumiwe kutokana na matokeo mabaya ya Kidato cha Nne mwaka 2012. Dkt Kawambwa pia amesema madai ya kumtaka ajiuzulu ni kelele za kupuuzwa kwani zinatolewa na wanasiasa waliokosa fursa za kuchaguliwa na kuwa madarakani hivyo wameamua kufanya propaganda. Amewataka wananchi kupuuza propaganda hizo kwani kama ni matokeo mabaya si kwa shule za serikali pekee nbali hata za watu binafsi zikiwemo Seminari pia zimefanya vibaya...
Source Star TV
Naona Waziri ameamua kuleta visingizio. Huyu ndiye tunatarajia atutoe hapa tulipo na atauongoze kutafuta suluhu ya janga hili lakini yeye haoni kama Taasisi anayoiongoza yaani Wizara ya Elimu ina mchango mkubwa katika hili....Tutafika?
More of the same: A comparison of the actual and politically standardised results of the National Form Examinations 2012Dr Kitila Mkumbo
This year the National Examinations Council of Tanzania was forced to issue twice the results of the Form Four National Examinations that were conducted in 2012. The first round of results were issued in February 2013, which sent shock waves across the country with 65.5 percent of the candidates failing and only 6.4 percent scoring at Division I-III. Following the massive outcry from the public, the Government was compelled to form a special team to investigate what it termed the causes of the exceptionally massive failures in the Form Four examinations. Led by an associate professor in law, and having ‘discovered’ that the results were based on a different and wrong grading system, the team came up with a magic bullet, recommending that the 2012 Form Four results should be re-graded or standardised basing on the grading system used for the 2011 results.
To the experts of educational measurement and assessment, and educationists in general, this was clearly a joke in the academy. Of course the Government was clever enough to pick a lawyer to lead this team to undertake a technically educational exercise. Reluctantly, the National Examinations Council of Tanzania heeded to the Government’s directive to politically standardise the results. This was clearly a political move to cool down the public anger, which this time round seemed to go beyond the normalcy of Tanzanians of complaining briefly over a glass of beer or soda and let it go. The public outcry was sustained for so long that the Government deemed it necessary to do something to subdue it.
Now the politically standardised results are out and it is paramount that we do some comparison to see whether there are any significant changes between them and the actual results released in February 2013. In this comparison, I take a look at the results of the two rounds generally and then by subject. As it can be seen in the following analyses, the results confirm the hypotheses we made following the Government’s directive, that there would be a change in the results, but with no significant difference between the actual results and the politically standardised results. Follow me in the analyses below to see how things unfold.
General Performance
Figure 1 below summarises the results in the two rounds. As this figure shows, Both sets of the results, actual and politically standardised ones, show that less than one percent of the candidates scored at Division One, and only 2.8 percent of the candidates scored at Division Two in the standardised results compared to 1.8 percent in the first round of the results, giving a difference of only one percent. In both cases, less than 10 percent of the candidates scored Division III (4.2 percent in the actual results compared to 5.9 percent in the standardised results). Just about a third (33.5%) of the candidates scored Division IV in the standardised results compared to 28.1 percent in the actual results.
Overall, 56.9 percent of the candidates failed in the standardised results, which does not significantly vary from the actual results where 65.5 percent of the candidates failed. Furthermore, 90.5 percent of the candidates scored at Division IV and Division 0 when combined together in the standardised results, which does not differ significantly from the proportion of candidates who scored at these grades in the actual results (93.6%). In both cases, less than 10 percent of the candidates scored at Division I-III (6.4 % in the actual results vs. 9.5% in the standardised results), and less than 50 percent of the candidates passed at Division I-IV in both cases (43.1% in the actual results and 34.5% in the standardised results.
Figure 1: A comparison of performance in the National Form Four Examinations 2012-actual and standardised results
Subject performance
As Figure 2 below shows, the worst performance is seen in Mathematics in both cases, with only 12.1 percent of the candidates passing in the standardised results compared to 9.1 percent in the actual results. History is another subject which records massive failures, with just about a quarter of the candidates passing after standardisation compared to 19.9 percent of the candidates who passed at the first round. Generally, contrary to popular belief that candidates do better in arts and social science subjects than in natural sciences, the performance in arts and social sciences, in both cases, is far worse than in natural sciences. For example, apart from Kiswahili, the best performance is in Chemistry where 47.2 percent of the candidates passed in the standardised results compared to only 28 percent of the candidates who passed in Civics. Indeed, apart from Basic Mathematics, the worst performance is seen in History.
Overall, the subject performance in the two cases, actual and standardised results, does not differ significantly, even though, expectedly, the performance is slightly better in the politically standardised results than in the actual results.
Figure 2: Subject performance comparison in the two cases of results
Conclusion
Clearly, the politically standardised results have re-affirmed our earlier position that there was nothing wrong with the 2012 Form Four National Examinations, neither was there anything wrong with the marking or grading system used. Though there has been almost a 10 percent drop in the failure rate from 65.5 percent to 56.9 percent, this failure rate is still worse than the 2011 results, and the worst ever in the history of national form four examinations in Tanzania. These results have re-affirmed further that the students failed, and that they were failed by our education system. It was therefore a political gimmicky for the Government to order the regarding of the results. The directive to re-grade the results may have managed to hoodwink the public and provide a relief to the politicians in the ruling class for a while, but it does not help to address the underlying causes of the massive failures in our education system.Ni rahisi sana Kwa ngamia kupenya kwenye Tundu Lisu la Sindano kuliko Kiongozi Bora kupatikana kwa njia ya Kupiga Kura Tanzania
This year the National Examinations Council of Tanzania was forced to issue twice the results of the Form Four National Examinations that were conducted in 2012. The first round of results were issued in February 2013, which sent shock waves across the country with 65.5 percent of the candidates failing and only 6.4 percent scoring at Division I-III. Following the massive outcry from the public, the Government was compelled to form a special team to investigate what it termed the causes of the exceptionally massive failures in the Form Four examinations. Led by an associate professor in law, and having ‘discovered’ that the results were based on a different and wrong grading system, the team came up with a magic bullet, recommending that the 2012 Form Four results should be re-graded or standardised basing on the grading system used for the 2011 results.
To the experts of educational measurement and assessment, and educationists in general, this was clearly a joke in the academy. Of course the Government was clever enough to pick a lawyer to lead this team to undertake a technically educational exercise. Reluctantly, the National Examinations Council of Tanzania heeded to the Government’s directive to politically standardise the results. This was clearly a political move to cool down the public anger, which this time round seemed to go beyond the normalcy of Tanzanians of complaining briefly over a glass of beer or soda and let it go. The public outcry was sustained for so long that the Government deemed it necessary to do something to subdue it.
Now the politically standardised results are out and it is paramount that we do some comparison to see whether there are any significant changes between them and the actual results released in February 2013. In this comparison, I take a look at the results of the two rounds generally and then by subject. As it can be seen in the following analyses, the results confirm the hypotheses we made following the Government’s directive, that there would be a change in the results, but with no significant difference between the actual results and the politically standardised results. Follow me in the analyses below to see how things unfold.
General Performance
Figure 1 below summarises the results in the two rounds. As this figure shows, Both sets of the results, actual and politically standardised ones, show that less than one percent of the candidates scored at Division One, and only 2.8 percent of the candidates scored at Division Two in the standardised results compared to 1.8 percent in the first round of the results, giving a difference of only one percent. In both cases, less than 10 percent of the candidates scored Division III (4.2 percent in the actual results compared to 5.9 percent in the standardised results). Just about a third (33.5%) of the candidates scored Division IV in the standardised results compared to 28.1 percent in the actual results.
Overall, 56.9 percent of the candidates failed in the standardised results, which does not significantly vary from the actual results where 65.5 percent of the candidates failed. Furthermore, 90.5 percent of the candidates scored at Division IV and Division 0 when combined together in the standardised results, which does not differ significantly from the proportion of candidates who scored at these grades in the actual results (93.6%). In both cases, less than 10 percent of the candidates scored at Division I-III (6.4 % in the actual results vs. 9.5% in the standardised results), and less than 50 percent of the candidates passed at Division I-IV in both cases (43.1% in the actual results and 34.5% in the standardised results.
Figure 1: A comparison of performance in the National Form Four Examinations 2012-actual and standardised results
Subject performance
As Figure 2 below shows, the worst performance is seen in Mathematics in both cases, with only 12.1 percent of the candidates passing in the standardised results compared to 9.1 percent in the actual results. History is another subject which records massive failures, with just about a quarter of the candidates passing after standardisation compared to 19.9 percent of the candidates who passed at the first round. Generally, contrary to popular belief that candidates do better in arts and social science subjects than in natural sciences, the performance in arts and social sciences, in both cases, is far worse than in natural sciences. For example, apart from Kiswahili, the best performance is in Chemistry where 47.2 percent of the candidates passed in the standardised results compared to only 28 percent of the candidates who passed in Civics. Indeed, apart from Basic Mathematics, the worst performance is seen in History.
Overall, the subject performance in the two cases, actual and standardised results, does not differ significantly, even though, expectedly, the performance is slightly better in the politically standardised results than in the actual results.
Figure 2: Subject performance comparison in the two cases of results
Conclusion
Clearly, the politically standardised results have re-affirmed our earlier position that there was nothing wrong with the 2012 Form Four National Examinations, neither was there anything wrong with the marking or grading system used. Though there has been almost a 10 percent drop in the failure rate from 65.5 percent to 56.9 percent, this failure rate is still worse than the 2011 results, and the worst ever in the history of national form four examinations in Tanzania. These results have re-affirmed further that the students failed, and that they were failed by our education system. It was therefore a political gimmicky for the Government to order the regarding of the results. The directive to re-grade the results may have managed to hoodwink the public and provide a relief to the politicians in the ruling class for a while, but it does not help to address the underlying causes of the massive failures in our education system.Ni rahisi sana Kwa ngamia kupenya kwenye Tundu Lisu la Sindano kuliko Kiongozi Bora kupatikana kwa njia ya Kupiga Kura Tanzania
Msajili wa vyama vya siasa John Tendwa amesema hatimaye amefanikiwa kukamilisha sheria itakayoshikisha adabu wanasiasa.
Tendwa amesema sheria hiyo inasema mwanasiasa yeyote atakayekamatwa akitukana kiongozi atafungwa miezi sita na chama chake kupigwa marufuku kufanya siasa eneo husika.Tendwa kasema atahakikisha hakutakuwa na kutoa faini kwa watakaokutwa na hatia.
Tendwa huku akicheka amesema hiyo itakuwa dawa kwa wale wanaotukana viongozi wa serikali,wanaotukana polisi na wanaomtukana msajili.
Tendwa amemalizia kusema kuna vyama vinapata umaarufu halafu wanalewa umaarufu na kutukana wenye mamlaka.
Source:ITV
"Mh,nasikiliza clouds apa millard yupo south hospital alipolazwa m to the p,nasikia ndugu zake wanapiga ung'eng'e millard na yes na no kila wakat mweh kumbe lugha imegoma.jamaa ni mmoja kati ya watangazaji hot kwa apa town,yupo makini sana na kazi yake na anaiweza,ila clouds wamsaidie hat kumsomesha nje ili a improve his language jaman duh,sio kumtumia tu mpeleken shule jamaa mkali ana confidence angejitahid lugha tu bas atafika mbali sana,nimeshangaa duh ila nimependa confidence zake mwanzo mwisho yes no tu" from jamii forum
millard ayo na mr 2 a.k.a sugu
Siku moja kwenye kipindi cha Amplifire cha Radio Clouds nilishangazwa na kitendo cha Millard Ayo kupiga wimbo wa 'Hakuna Matata' wa Mr. II a.k.a Sugu ambaye pia ni mbunge wa Mbeya mjini. Na siyo siku hiyo tu pia Millard Ayo alipiga tena wimbo huu.
Uenda ukaniuliza nini kilinishangaza,lakini ni kutokana na kutokuwepo kwa maelewano kwa miaka kadhaa sasa kati ya uongozi wa clouds. Na hata nyimbo zake uwa hazichezwi na kituo hiki cha Radio,pamoja na nyimbo za wasanii wenzie wa kundi lake la Vinega. Na si kawaida pia kwa watangazaji wengine wa Clouds kupiga nyimbo za Sugu.
Nampa Hongera Millard Ayo na ninamtabiria atafika mbali sana,kwa sababu anaonekana kusimamia kile anachoamini. Na hata blog yake ya Millard Ayo ni moja ya blog ambazo kwa upande wangu ninaziona ni bora.
sikiliza wimbo wa 'Hakuna matata' wa Sugu hapa Listen to SUGU-HAKUNA MATATA (PRODUCED BY ASHVIN & HERMY B) on Hulkshare - Free Music Streaming & Download
Kampuni za Blandina Nyoni zinavyofanya ufisadi serikalini
Sasa wakuu wa JF tunasema kuwa WE SPEAK OPENLY sasa naomba thread iachwe hapa tukate zote bila kuogopa kitu
Huyu mama ndiye aliyehusika na kuileta ile software ya ASYCUDA Tanzania ambako alichukua fungu kubwa sana za kamisheni toka serikalini
Lakini pia msisahu kuwa ana kampuni ya Catering ambayo kila wizara anayohamia au kila warsha anayokwenda lazima kampuni hiyo ipewe tenda ya kulisha chakula
Lakini msisahau kuwa duka la nguo la Mariedo ni lake.... duka ambalo hata mkaguzi mkuu wa serikali (CAG) alitoa ripoti kulishutumu kwa kugawa staff uniform zilizo na ubora hafifu kwenye wizara na idara mbali mbali za serikali pamoja na fenicha za ofisi ya spika kwa bei za juu kuliko uhalisi wa bei........... sasa hapa kidogo kulitokea matatizo........ Ludovick Utoh (ambaye PASCO huja kumtetea humu) sijui hakujua kama lile duka la Mariedo ni la Nyoni au la mpaka ripoti ikatolewa kwenye public jambo ambalo ni aibu sana kwa mama Nyoni
Tazameni track record ya huyu mama kila wizara aliyopita na procurements za kwenye idara za hizo wizara utaweza kuona connection ya ufisadi wake.
Kwenye public anakuwa mkali kwenye matumizi ya fedha lakini ukweli ni kuwa alikuwa anataka yake pekee yaende
Lakini kwa kumalizia tuu ni kuwa anatokea Iringa kwenye kijiji kimoja na aliyekuwa katibu mkuu kiongozi Ikulu bwana PHILEMON LUHANJO....... by jamii forum
Hakuna maoni:
Chapisha Maoni